Plant directors ask about risk and ROI, brewmasters and process engineers ask about control, quality managers ask about records. Straight answers to all three, with the roadmap stated as roadmap.
Illustrative scenario: Plant run · one lager batch from brewhouse to can · brewhouse, cellar, filler, tunnel pasteurizer. Not a measured run.
Only at the autonomy stage your plant has set, and only to an explicit allow-list of low-risk loops inside documented limits. Every design partner starts in shadow mode, where Brewira predicts and writes nothing. Assist mode follows, where a brewmaster or process engineer approves each recommendation. Bounded autonomy on filling, carbonation and inspection loops comes after the food-safety and ROI gates agreed up front.
Critical control points are not optimization variables. The pasteurization PU profile, the CIP release checks and the batch release decision stay with your HACCP plan and your people. Brewira verifies readings, writes them to an immutable audit log and attaches them to the batch genealogy. It is grounded in HACCP, FSMA, FSSC 22000 and BRCGS procedures; it is not a certification and does not replace your plan.
Brewira sits above your existing automation as a supervisory layer. If it stops, the plant keeps running on its current PLC and SCADA control and the interlocks it already has. A Brewira outage degrades the plant to the way it runs today, not to a stop.
The first phase is shadow mode on one line: Brewira reads your analyzers, PLC history, lab results and MES while you run the plant as usual, and we measure its predictions against your lab, QA and PLC outcomes. Recommendations start when accuracy is proven against that baseline, and improve as plant-specific history and brewmaster corrections accumulate.
Recipes, product specs, tolerance models and supplier data are tenant-scoped and never used to train another customer's models. Retrieval is multi-tenant isolated and permission-aware. Cross-plant learning, where a customer opts in, is federated and IP-isolated. On-prem deployment is available for producers protecting sensitive recipes.
You are, the same as with any control strategy. That is why every write is policy-checked, bounded, logged and reversible, every output carries a citation to the recipe or procedure it relied on, and anything above your threshold waits for a named approver. The audit log records the request, the reasoning, the limits applied and the human decision.
As a design partner, on one line, with one hard metric: fill giveaway and low-fill rejects, leaker and seal faults, attenuation variance and tank time, CO2 use and clarity rejects, or water and energy on pasteurization and CIP. We instrument the line in shadow mode, measure the baseline, move to assist mode when accuracy is proven, and expand only when the number holds.
Full multi-module autonomy across the whole plant, long-tail integrations beyond the design partners' stacks, and self-serve onboarding. The first release is one wedge workflow, its connectors, the agent loop with human checkpoints, the review console and the assurance-grade food-safety audit log.
Every Brewira run is an ordered, inspectable sequence. This is run_scn_01, an illustrative scenario: Plant run · one lager batch from brewhouse to can · brewhouse, cellar, filler, tunnel pasteurizer. Scenario complete · batch inside spec · one human approval at the pasteurizer.
Plant Orchestrator · Pulled the recipe, the package spec, the HACCP plan with its pasteurization critical control point, the yeast lot record and the standing CIP window from the beverage MES and the lab system; locked the target envelope for the run.
Plant Orchestrator · Simulated 24 candidate brew, fermentation and carbonation plans on the Cuvera as-produced twin; ranked them on gravity margin, predicted finish time, CO2 target, PU margin, takt and CO2 and energy use, and discarded every candidate that thinned the pasteurization margin.
Brew-and-Blend · Held wort gravity to recipe from the inline gravity analyzer and the brewhouse PLC, trimming the blend and utilization setpoints inside the recipe window rather than correcting after a spot lab check.
Ferment-and-Yeast · Predicted the attenuation curve and finish time for the tank from inline gravity, dissolved oxygen and CO2, pH and temperature; held the temperature ramp and timed the crash inside the brewmaster-approved window; no stuck or runaway fermentation was flagged.
Filter-and-Carbonate · Fused inline CO2, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, temperature and pressure; held carbonation to the package target with the minimum CO2 and timed the filter backwash from the predicted loading instead of a fixed schedule.
Fill-and-Seal · Adjusted fill valves toward the target level inside the approved window using drift feedback from inspection, and ran seam checks on the seamer; the filler corrected upstream instead of rejecting downstream.
Defect-and-Inspect · 16 camera streams at the line edge: fill level, seam and cap, label and date code, foreign body and container checks on every can; three low-fill rejects were attributed to one filler valve and Fill-and-Seal corrected it.
Pasteurize-and-CIP · Held the tunnel pasteurizer on the validated PU profile at the lowest zone energy inside the envelope; every critical control point reading was written to the audit log against the HACCP plan and the CIP release checks were armed.
Plant Orchestrator · The lowest-energy candidate wanted to move the pasteurizer CIP into a window that overlapped the next brand's start. Held for the shift quality manager, who kept the validated PU profile untouched and approved the CIP move with a tighter release check.
Quality-and-Conformance · Batch released: gravity and attenuation curves, yeast lot, CO2 and clarity, fill and seal outcomes, inspection rejects, PU readings, CIP release and every human decision written to the batch genealogy and checked against spec.
Every tool invocation, argument and result is written to an immutable, human-readable log, and every reasoning step is expandable. Nothing about a run is hidden from the plant. The log below is the scenario run, not a measured one.
Goal, plan, thought, action, observation, exactly as the orchestrator would record it.
Brew batch L-0931 to recipe gravity, ferment it to target attenuation, carbonate and fill it to spec at line speed, pasteurize it on the validated PU profile and release it with full genealogy.
Simulate the whole batch on the twin first. Lead with gravity so the cellar gets the right wort and the filler gets the right CO2. Verify the pasteurization critical control point continuously. Let the filler chase target level only inside the approved window; hold anything beyond the envelope for a human.
The standing practice over-fills to avoid low fills and over-gasses to avoid flat product. With continuous fill-level estimation and inline CO2 the filler and the carbonator can sit at target. The saving is giveaway, not safety margin: the pasteurization CCP is never a candidate for optimization.
twin.simulate(candidates=24) → plan #7: gravity on recipe, finish day 5, CO2 at package target, PU margin unchanged, lowest predicted CO2 and energy per hectoliter.
Plan #7 wants the pasteurizer CIP in a window that overlaps the next brand's start. The policy engine routes that single move to the shift quality manager and permits the other seven writes.
Execute plan #7 at the bounded stage: brewhouse blend, tank ramp, CO2 dosing and fill-valve writes proceed; PU is verified continuously; the CIP move waits.
Approval granted at 06:33:44 with the PU profile untouched and a tighter CIP release check. Three low-fill rejects were attributed to filler valve 14 and corrected by Fill-and-Seal inside the approved window.
Scenario complete. The batch is released with gravity and attenuation curves, yeast lot, CO2 and clarity, fill and seal outcomes, PU readings, CIP release and the human decision in the genealogy. No measured plant result is claimed; this is the run the platform is designed to execute.
A plant does not go from manual to bounded control in one step. Brewira makes the stage explicit per loop, auditable and reversible at any time, and some decisions never leave the person.
| Stage | What the agent does | What the person does | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shadow | Predicts gravity, attenuation, carbonation, fill and seal faults, contamination and takt; writes nothing | Runs the plant as today; compares predictions to lab, QA and PLC outcomes | First phase with every design partner |
| Assist | Recommends bounded brew, fermentation, carbonation, fill and seal, pasteurization and CIP moves with the evidence | A brewmaster, process engineer or quality manager approves or rejects each one | After accuracy is proven against the baseline |
| Bounded | Writes low-risk filling, carbonation and inspection setpoints inside documented recipe, quality, food-safety, equipment and rollback limits | Approves anything above the limits; reviews the shift record | After the food-safety and ROI gates agreed up front |
| Exceptions | Escalates anything outside its envelope, CCP-adjacent moves and release decisions | Always decides these; the agent never does | Permanent |
Brewira writes to production equipment in a food plant. Every capability is scoped, every write is policy-checked, every output is cited, and every action is written to an append-only audit log the plant owns.
| Item | Scope | Status |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type I | Cloud control plane | QUEUED Roadmap, first 6 months |
| SOC 2 Type II | Cloud control plane | QUEUED Roadmap, 6 to 12 months |
| HACCP · FSMA · FSSC 22000 · BRCGS | Grounding and record-keeping | RUNNING Design basis for retrieval and the audit log |
| Per-tenant isolation | Data, memory, models | RUNNING Design rule |
| On-prem deployment | Recipe-sensitive producers | RUNNING Design option |
Brewira supports your food-safety records. It is not a certification and it does not replace your HACCP plan.
| Failure | Designed response |
|---|---|
| Edge node stops | Plant continues on existing PLC and SCADA control; the gap is recorded |
| Model drifts from the lab or checkweigher | Calibration flags it; loop drops to assist or shadow; rollback by version |
| Agent wants an out-of-envelope move | Held for a named approver; logged with reasoning and limits |
| Two agents want one actuator | Orchestrator arbitrates on the run goal; food safety outranks takt; both requests logged |
| PU reading out of profile | Your HACCP plan and interlocks act; Brewira records and alerts, never overrides |
Land on one workflow with a measured baseline. Expand by line, module, site and autonomy stage. Outcome components available on yield, loss, energy and water.
Brew, fill or pasteurization control, or inspection AI, for one line. For beverage makers validating ROI on the wedge.
The whole plant: brew and blend, ferment and yeast, filter and carbonate, fill and seal, pasteurize and CIP, defect and inspect, quality and shelf life, yield and takt, robotic handling and the Cuvera twin.
Beverage groups standardizing on Brewira across sites, with custom recipe, product and tolerance models.
A 15 to 20% discount for annual prepayment.
Enterprise agreements with usage ramps.
A share of measured yield, loss, giveaway, water or energy improvement on the highest-value workflows.
Per-batch, per-line or per-action metering above plan limits.
Brewira reads and writes through the systems already on the floor. No parallel historian, no new HMI, no rip-and-replace. Connectors are built against each design partner's stack first; long-tail integrations are out of scope for the first release.
PLC and SCADA of brewhouse, blending and syrup systems, fermentation tanks and yeast handling
Setpoint reads, guarded writes, interlocks untouched
Filtration and carbonation skids and their inline CO2, dissolved-oxygen and turbidity analyzers
Continuous carbonation and clarity state
High-speed filler, seamer and capper controls
Telemetry in; fill-valve and seam settings inside approved windows
Tunnel and flash pasteurizers, CIP skids and hygiene sensors
PU readings verified and logged; CIP release checks
Multi-camera stations for fill level, seal and cap, label, foreign body and container defects
Frames, defect events, reject commands
Orders, recipes, product specs, batch genealogy, LIMS results
Targets in, release records out
Plant and asset meters; Isaac-driven pack, case and palletizing cells
Hard constraints for scheduling; bounded handling
SSO and role-based access; SOC 2 on the roadmap
Named approvers, scoped roles
One policy model, one audit trail and one set of yield, loss, giveaway, water and energy benchmarks across every plant in the group, with each site's recipes and tolerance models kept private to that site.
The three people in a beverage plant whose week changes when the process runs itself, and what each of them needs from Brewira.
Owns production rate, quality, loss, giveaway and yield, water and energy, and food safety. Wants a plant that holds spec at higher rate with fewer interventions, and a number that justifies the spend.
Owns recipes, brewhouse and blend, fermentation and carbonation process windows and yield. Approves and corrects the agents in assist mode; those corrections train the models.
Owns product quality and safety under HACCP, FSMA, FSSC 22000 and BRCGS, contamination and fill and seal conformance, and batch genealogy. Needs every action grounded, cited and written to an immutable record.
IT/OT and sustainability leads approve the deployment. There are no customer quotes on this site yet; design partners will speak for themselves when they choose to.
Ask it. A person reads every message and answers in plain language.
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc close
